Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 12 results ...

Abdul-Rahman, H, Berawi, M A, Berawi, A R, Mohamed, O, Othman, M and Yahya, I A (2006) Delay Mitigation in the Malaysian Construction Industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 125–33.

Carter, G and Smith, S D (2006) Safety Hazard Identification on Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 197–205.

Cottrell, D S (2006) Contractor Process Improvement for Enhancing Construction Productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 189–96.

Cox, R F, Issa, R R and Frey, A (2006) Proposed Subcontractor-Based Employee Motivational Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 152–63.

Huang, X and Hinze, J (2006) Owner’s Role in Construction Safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 164–73.

Huang, X and Hinze, J (2006) Owner’s Role in Construction Safety: Guidance Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 174–81.

Ling, F Y, Ibbs, C W and Hoo, W Y (2006) Determinants of International Architectural, Engineering, and Construction Firms’ Project Success in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 206–14.

Nepal, M P, Park, M and Son, B (2006) Effects of Schedule Pressure on Construction Performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 182–8.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Construction management; Productivity; Quality control; Scheduling; Labor;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:2(182)
  • Abstract:
    Accelerating a project can be rewarding. The consequences, however, can be troublesome if productivity and quality are sacrificed for the sake of remaining ahead of schedule, such that the actual schedule benefits are often barely worth the effort. The tradeoffs and paths of schedule pressure—and its causes and effects—are often overlooked when schedule decisions are being made. This paper analyzes the effects that schedule pressure has on construction performance, and focuses on tradeoffs in scheduling. A research framework has been developed using a causal diagram to illustrate the cause-and-effect analysis of schedule pressure. An empirical investigation has been performed by using survey data collected from 102 construction practitioners working in 38 construction sites in Singapore. The results of this survey data analysis indicate that advantages of increasing the pace of work—by working under schedule pressure—can be offset by losses in productivity and quality. The negative effects of schedule pressure arise mainly by working out of sequence, generating work defects, cutting corners, and losing the motivation to work. The adverse effects of schedule pressure can be minimized by scheduling construction activities realistically and planning them proactively, motivating workers, and by establishing an effective project coordination and communication mechanism.

Sadeghpour, F, Moselhi, O and Alkass, S T (2006) Computer-Aided Site Layout Planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 143–51.

Shih, N and Huang, S (2006) 3D Scan Information Management System for Construction Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 134–42.

Telem, D, Shapira, A, Goren, Y D and Schexnayder, C J (2006) Moving a Reinforced-Concrete Building: Case Study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 115–24.

Zhang, X (2006) Public Clients’ Best Value Perspectives of Public Private Partnerships in Infrastructure Development. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(02), 107–14.